Match rates

What applicants who matched their preferred specialty looked like, compared with those who didn't. From NRMP's Charting Outcomes (2024), IMG edition. It shows who matched. It's not a prediction of your odds.
53%
of the 7,852 Non-U.S. IMGs in the data matched their preferred specialty (NRMP 2024).
Other stats
Averages, as reported to NRMP. "Didn't match" means they didn't match their preferred specialty.
Measure Matched n=4196 Didn't match n=3656
Rank-list length
Programs ranked in this specialty in a row. The clearest lever in the data: longer lists match more
6.2 2.5
Specialties ranked
1.0 means they applied to this specialty only
1.3 1.4
USMLE Step 2 CK
The score programs screen on
245 240
Research experiences
2.8 3.1
Abstracts, presentations & publications
8.3 7.3
Work experiences
4.1 4.3
Volunteer experiences
2.8 2.8
Have a PhD
1.8% 2.4%
Have another graduate degree
19.4% 22.0%
USMLE Step 1
Legacy: pass/fail since 2022, so these are partial
234 228
Shaded is the higher number of the two. Higher isn't always better here: the groups trade places by measure (look at research and degrees).

"Matched" means matched to the preferred specialty shown; many who didn't still matched another specialty or in SOAP. Most of these numbers are self-reported. Step 2 CK is the score programs screen on; Step 1 went pass/fail in 2022, so its numbers here are old and partial.

Flagged small-sample rows are just a handful of people, so read them as rough, not a cutoff. We show the numbers, never a prediction of your odds.

Source: NRMP Charting Outcomes in the Match: International Medical Graduates, 2024. © NRMP.